Sunday, December 13, 2015
Family Law in Crisis.
Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Travel to Mediation
Thursday, October 1, 2015
One Barrister's Perspective on Settlement.
Tuesday, September 29, 2015
Vale Charles Cooper
Monday, September 28, 2015
Panel of Mediators
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Welcome news on Domestic Violence
Monday, August 10, 2015
Could conversation ever die out ?
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Panellist- Anna Faoagali
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Panellist Donna Cooper
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Panellist--Pat Cavanagh
Flexibility of Mediation
Monday, April 20, 2015
Landmark decision of Full Family Court in Fields & Smith
The much awaited decision of the Full Family Court in Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 was handed down on 17 April 2015. https://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#article=389655
In holding that there should be an equal distribution of the parties’ assets, the Court confirmed that there is no binding rule of “special contributions” and endorsed the view of the Full Court in Hoffman & Hoffman [2014] FamCAFC 92 where the Court said at paragraph 52:
“… we consider that the point being made is that there is no principle or guideline (or indeed anything else emerging from s 79), that renders the direct contribution of income or capital more important – or “special” – when compared against indirect contributions and, in particular, contributions to the home or the welfare of the family…”
At paragraph 187 of Fields & Smith the Court said:
187. In this case, the contributions of both parties over a lengthy period were substantial and significant. The wife’s contributions to the welfare of the family are in themselves significantcontributions and s 79 does not suggest that one kind of contribution should be treated as less important or valuable than another.
Commenting on the case, in the Australian of 20 April 2015, well- known family lawyer Paul Doolan noted inter alia that:
“In cases involving high-net-wealth parties who built up their assets together, the fact that one party produced the income during the relationship is not to be seen as more important than the role played by the other in making contributions to the family.”
Monday, March 2, 2015
Brisbane Mediations-Current Availability
Sunday, February 15, 2015
"The Green Prince": There are (at least) two sides to every story OR It's all about your perspective
The film is a scripted documentary. The main "characters" are Palestinian, Mosab Hassan Yousef and Israeli, Gonen. Mosab is the eldest and most dutiful son of a senior and influential figure in the zealously anti-Israeli Hamas. Gonen, on the other hand, is an Israeli secret service operative in the ruthless anti-Palestinian Shin Bet, with a background including psychology.
Under the carefully manipulative influence of Gonen, Mosab is transformed. At 17 he is angry and hell bent on avenging what he perceives to be the unjust and cruel targeting and repetitive jailing of his much loved and respected father by Israeli forces. A stint in prison, however, showed him first hand how Hamas members in prison committed greater atrocities on their own with less justification in his view than the Israelis. Over time he came to see the basis of Hamas's terror tactics in Israel as flawed and even his father as one-eyed and not amenable to reason.
Not only did Mosab become a highly prized informant for the Israelis by virtue of his close association with his father as his trusted advisor and assistant, but he and Gonen developed a relationship based on genuine trust and affection - to the extent that they demonstrated extreme loyalty towards each other in the face of great risk of harm or even death at the hands of zealously single-minded individuals in both Shin Bet and Hamas.
Was Mosab a selfish person who worked for the Israelis to save his own skin or did he undergo a true moral awakening in the face of the deaths of so many Israeli citizens at the hands of suicide bombings and other violent tactics orchestrated by Hamas?
How is it he was able to betray (according to his upbringing and his nationality) his father and his kinsmen? Was it in fact betrayal or did he believe that if he could help stop the violence perpetrated by Hamas then there might be a better world for Israeli and Palestinian alike?
What about Gonen? Did he really connect with Mosab at a human level, or was Mosab no more than a much valued prize pawn in the fight against Hamas?
Talk about 50 shades of grey: I'm thinking that in this situation 50 might be an underestimation!
Are there any similarities or learnings here for us to take into dispute resolution for separating couples, disputing workers, extended families in crisis?
Methinks there is always more than one story to hear and that there are also many ways to view each story. When in doubt, don't judge. Listen, listen and keep listening and potential solutions will usually emerge under the guidance of a skilled and sensitive mediator.
Sunday, February 8, 2015
Trust pays Dividends in Mediation
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Separation, Divorce and Re-birth. What can Peter Greste and Reese Witherspoon's movie, "Wild", teach us?
He is processing mixed feelings which no doubt include immense personal relief and gratitude as well as a version of "survivor guilt" for being free whilst his two colleagues remain incarcerated.
Although he is not saying as much, it is probably also likely that, as an adaptable person, he had adjusted to the restrictions of life behind bars and that freedom will demand debriefing and re-adjustment so he can fully resume executive responsibility for his own life.
Peter Greste's experiences have common features with those of Cheryl Strayed as depicted in her biographical, Wild: From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail and played by Reese Witherspoon in the movie, Wild, currently in Australian cinemas.
Strayed wrote about her epic journey - essentially alone and on foot - across the PCT (the 1000 mile Pacific Crest Trail which is closely aligned with the Sierra Nevada and Cascade mountain ranges and runs between the US border with Mexico and that with Canada through the states of California, Oregon and Washington). This was her self prescribed healing process after losing her mother prematurely and reacting with self abuse through drugs and promiscuity with the result that she also lost herself.
Strayed dared to ask the questions: "What if I could forgive myself?" "What if all those things I did were the things that got me here?" In walking, she was trying to find the girl her mother always believed she was when she advised her to, "Find your best self and when you do, hold onto it forever". In Strayed's words, "After I lost myself in the wilderness of my grief, I found my own way out of the woods".
This was Cheryl Strayed's re-birthing experience. Peter Greste is also experiencing a re-birth subsequent to 400 days in his own "wilderness". Both experiences are powerful and positive and neither would have been possible without a prolonged period of deprivation, self-discipline and extension of personal limits.
How do you plan to re-birth after you come out of the tunnel of grief and adjustment associated with separation and divorce?
Thursday, January 29, 2015
A Spirit of Compromise in Mediation. Hindsight is a wonderful thing!
Mediation has gained popularity because courts have failed to provide inexpensive and timely outcomes for disputing parties.
Mediation can be convened quickly, is less expensive (often vastly so), and enables parties to move on with their lives without undue delay.
Success at Mediation is greatly assisted by proper disclosure and transparent dealings. A spirit of compromise - including willingness to listen to the other party's views and acknowledgment that court outcomes are discretionary and usually encompass a range of possible outcomes- improves prospects of resolution.
Some time ago we undertook a mediation intake for a party who chose not to proceed with the mediation but rather to embark on litigation, confident in his solicitor's advice that a particular favourable outcome would be achieved.
Later, on returning to mediation on a peripheral issue, the same party expressed considerable lament that he had not continued to mediate in the first instance. After he and the other party had each spent approximately $150,000, he had been told by the same solicitor 'at the door of the court' that, "Today is the day we compromise our position to try to achieve a settlement".
Whilst the solicitor was no doubt confident in his original advice, the client would have been better served by exploring a range of possible outcomes at mediation and compromising to achieve an outcome both parties could accept. They could then have moved on emotionally earlier and the money spent on litigation would have been available to fund the more wholesome needs of themselves and their children.
Sunday, January 25, 2015
There's no such thing as "A Happy Divorce". Or is there?
How much less often do we talk of learning from a relationship and separation experience, having another chance, the benefits of the experience to new relationships, or being freed to pursue more personal goals? It can and often does transpire that in time a relationship breakdown is viewed positively - by not just one but by both parties.
"That's all very well for some", you might say. "But what about the unfaithfulness, the lies, the breach of trust? What about my broken heart, the years wasted, the dreadful pain of rejection?"
Each separation experience is unique. Each separation experience is personal. Most are painful. Most trigger a grief process of variable duration and intensity and a recovery and adjustment period which is equally unpredictable in nature.
Separation,
How well separated adults recover and "move on", to use a colloquialism, is dependent on a wide range of factors: personality, the capacity to make a positive out of a negative, level of social and emotional support, and the quality and orientation of advice - to name a few.
The dismantling of an intimate relationship represents a loss and as with other grief experiences, can be likened to travelling through a tunnel. It is a process and the only way out is to go through it. It is helpful to keep a look out for that tiny glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel and continue to do whatever brings it closer. The journey is about recovery from the loss. The destination is a brighter, happier and more enlightened life experience.
Monday, January 12, 2015
Birdman - A clever portrayal of psychosis, black humour injected with fantasy, or an attempt to demonstrate the psychological fragility of actors in general?
To me, a Psychologist and Mediator, the lead role of Riggan Thomson, brilliantly played by Michael Keaton, is that of a late middle aged actor feeling washed up and surrendering, at times in dramatic style, to his alter ego Birdman - a character of his from a successful series of science fiction/super hero type films.
Riggan presents as being in the grip of psychotic visual and auditory hallucinations, delusions of grandeur and paranoid ideation and demonstrates an obvious cognitive blurring of the line between reality and fantasy.
At least, he did until the last scene .....
What do others think?
Could any of the many "interesting" characters in this movie have been helped by timely mediation or therapeutic counselling?
By the way, I have just discovered that congratulations are in order for Michael Keaton for winning "Best Actor in a Comedy" at the Golden Globes.
Good Advice for Separating Parties and All of Us
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
2015 has started with a bang at Brisbane Mediations
We have taken time out to look at what we did well in 2014 and what we may be able to improve or add to our services in 2015. We're back on deck energised and ready to listen.
Judging by the people who have already rung Krystina or come through our door for intake discussions this week, at least some problem situations have not magically disappeared over the Christmas holiday period.
This year, as always, we intend to deliver non-judgmental, supportive and skilled conflict management to our clients.
We must of course remain neutral and not "take sides" or lecture parties about what we believe is the best way to resolve their disputes. We do, however, challenge and assist with reality testing of desired outcomes, helping our clients to realise that just as there are at least two sides to every story, there are at least two perspectives to every dispute. The old saying, "It takes two to tango" could be modified to, "It takes at least two to create conflict".
Whether your dispute is the result of a relationship separation, entrenched tensions between extended family members, workplace disagreements or conflict over an estate you think has been unfairly apportioned, the Brisbane Mediations team is trained and equipped to assist.
It is our role to guide people in dispute to a resolution they can live with and that allows them to move on with their lives - if possible, without harbouring resentment. The team at Brisbane Mediations derive pleasure from seeing our clients relieved of the burden of emotionally draining and often financially expensive disputes. We've all seen enough of those in the Court system.
Life is short. Let's all make the most of it. At Brisbane Mediations we like to say, Things turn out best for the people who make the best out of the way things turn out. Just because you've had bad luck with someone significant in your world, you don't have to live the rest of your life with conflict, stress and regret. We aim to help our clients chalk it up to experience, let go of the bitterness and move on.
We know that the people who come to see us are usually hurting and feeling betrayed. Those feelings take time to heal, but we would love to start you off in a more positive direction with an agreement that, no matter how hard won, all parties can at least tolerate. Over time, the conflict can become a blip on the horizon.
Come in and see us and make 2015 your best year yet!